SET YOUR VEHICLE
FREE SHIPPING ON ORDERS OVER $70 in the contiguous US lower 48 states
TALK TO A PARTS EXPERT
SPECIALS!
Customer Photos and Videos
No user media. You can upload a photo or video of your install by posting a review.
3out of
5stars
HedleyLamarr4Governor
Returned- i wanted to like the flush design but it just looked odd on my JK. Tail lamp and brake light output is low compared to other options with more LEDs.
3out of
5stars
wrath
One of the problems with the JK is finding tail lights that look OK, that fit in the factory spot. Most look like they're for angry soccer Dads. These look OK and are passable as "belonging as a factory option". They're low profile while doing all the above listed so far. The Bad for the Price: The side marker isn't, it's simply a reflector. For the price, it should be lit. The brightness between the tail lights and the brake/turn signals is not significant. It should be *more*. The heat sink/mount for the backup lights is huge. It can make fitting difficult. You can grind on it to make it fit. The housing is cheaply made and doesn't follow the contours of the tub. The ones I got also aren't uniformly black. I think the release agent for the molds wasn't sprayed properly. I have seen these in the wild on other JKs and they didn't have these two problems. The resistors come with cheap brackets and are supposed to clip to the pinch weld using vampires to grip it. Yeah, not with those cheap brackets and clips. The resistor weighs too much and the retention clips are made of foil. So I just zip tied the brackets to something because the resistors don't get that hot. All in all, if you want a LED low-profile tail light that doesn't look too much like an angry soccer Dad was perusing Temu, these are great lights. I would even say they'd be great lights if they were a hundred bucks cheaper. But for around four Franklins, all of the above problems should not exist. So I'd give these a solid mediocre.
Product images
